Networks and Individuals: Opportunities and challenges in mapping relationships through the study of correspondence

The Lives and Afterlives of Letters Network’s three events for semester 1 take the form of four 10-minute lightning talks with 40 minutes of interdisciplinary discussion following, with a special focus on methodological issues and the sharing of best practices.

The first session took place on Thursday 12 October in the historic surrounds of the Christie Room at the John Rylands Library, and centred on the study of Networks and Individuals.

A report of the four lightning talks and the discussion following is provided below.

Roberta Mazza (UoM, Classics and Ancient History): Networking in Roman and Byzantine Egypt: Private Letters on Papyrus From the John Rylands Collection

jrl1502105
Letter from Heron to Heroninus, 2nd Century CE (John Rylands Library Greek P 57)

Dr Roberta Mazza, Lecturer in Graeco-Roman Material Culture, presented an overview of the focus of her recent research: the John Rylands Library’s collections of 2000 Greek and Latin papyri, of which only 750 have been published. Using exemplars from the Rylands collections, she demonstrated the importance of the study of both the textual and material aspects of these correspondence papyri. Such analysis reveals the social and economic capital of both senders and recipients, and allows scholars to reconstruct wider networks of contacts. Mazza demonstrated the use of the Trismegistos network mapping tool as a mechanism for mapping interrelationships through the study of the exchange of letters in the ancient world. Mazza’s discussion of digital papyrology addressed some of the challenges of digital approaches, including the problem of keeping such metadata accurate (as such letters are continually reread and reinterpreted) and accessible (in cross-compatible and sharable data formats). Mazza also considered the limitations of data visualisation in the study of networks in papyrology, which often does not reveal more than what was already understood through the application of traditional research methodologies.

Oscar Seip (UoM, Italian Studies): Reconstructing a Life and Afterlife: the Letters of Giulio Camillo (1480-1544)

Oscar Seip, final year PhD candidate at the John Rylands Research Institute and a member of the Network’s organising team, drew on aspects of his doctoral project to retrace Giulio Camillo’s life and works through his correspondence, which remains unedited and understudied. This correspondence includes 38 letters (preserved in manuscript and print editions) exchanged with 14 correspondents and mentioning a total of 50 individuals and connect to 12 locations. The correspondence fills gaps in our knowledge of the biography of Camillo, including the names of his sons (previously unknown), and additional names of students, patrons, and notables with whom he was in contact. It also offers important insight into the way Camillo exchanged poems and manuscripts with others prior to publication, and assists scholars in reconstructing the history of missing manuscripts. Seip also demonstrated the way in which Early Modern Letters Online (EMLO) has allowed him to expand the parameters of his research by opening up the possibility of discovering Camillo’s wider networks through searches of correspondence mentioning Camillo’s name but not sent or received by him. Through EMLO Seip was able to map Camillo as a node in a network between persons and professional associations in the broader intellectual environment of 16th century Europe.

Miranda Lewis (Oxford, EMLO): Correspondence Networks in the Early Modern Letters Online Database

Miranda Lewis, Digital Editor at the Cultures of Knowledge project, demonstrated the wide-ranging capabilities of Early Modern Letters Online’s ever expanding database of pan-European early modern correspondence. She showed, for example, how postal routes of 16th-18th century Europe could be reconstructed using the metadata in its database, and revealed the successes of recent network mapping experiments conducted using a union catalogue of 11,789 letter records. Lewis also explained the potential offered by cross-linking EMLO’s dataset with those of other digital letter collections, giving historians access to a rich resource through which the story of early modern letter writing can be told. The metadata collected by EMLO allows scholars to identify persons with a unique and permanent ID number and to make connections across correspondence corpora to identify and map institutional networks, such as those of special societies or universities. EMLO also allows for the visualization of the ego network and facilitates the identification and visualization of networks involving well- and lesser-known individuals, connecting nodes together to form a picture of a larger intellectual community, which could offer new and revolutionary perspectives on early modern lives. Lewis articulated the benefits of bringing together large datasets to ask bigger questions of the corpus of metadata, including the identification of sub-networks, subcultures, overlapping identities, and the spread of language, education, and culture of the senders and recipients in the correspondence corpora. There are also inherent challenges to such work – the usefulness of the data to research is unlocked through its interpretation, and this must be accompanied with a good understanding of the possibilities and limits of the data underlying the visualization generated, no matter how compelling.

Douglas Field & Imogen Durant (UoM, English and American Studies): 
Jeff Nuttall’s Underground Network

jrl16051211.jpg
Jeff Nuttall, “Bomb Culture” (1968) (John Rylands Library R226966)

Dr Douglas Field, Senior Lecturer in 20th Century American Literature, and Imogen Durant, a current PhD candidate at the John Rylands Research Institute, presented their work on the Jeff Nuttall papers, which are housed in the John Rylands Library’s Special Collections. The papers are an under-researched resource. If unlocked through cataloguing, they could assist scholars in reconstructing Nuttall’s networks in the 1960s and 1970s. In addition, the exchange of letters also carried with them materials relating to publications, counter-cultural discourse, new contacts, information about happenings and organized protests. Imogen described the challenges of cataloguing a collection of letters, and the way in which decisions about the metadata to be included in the catalogue were revised as work progressed. The information that this correspondence provides about Nuttall’s networks gives insight into counter-cultural exchange occurring in Blackburn, Leeds, Liverpool, and Kent, and illuminates the way in which materials, ideas, and connections were shared amongst British, American, and European counterparts. Network analysis of Nuttall’s correspondence also shows the regionality of correspondents and actors, decentering previous assumptions of the metropolitan focus of countercultural activity by Nuttall and his associates.

Discussion

The discussion following the lightning talks was wide-ranging, and picked up on the following themes:

  • How does language move through a network? What is the relationship of linguistics to the mapping of social networks?
  • How can network theory be used as a research methodology beyond visualization tools? How does the size of the dataset affect how this data can be transformed into useful knowledge?
  • What kind of filtration processes can be applied to such correspondence databases? Participants discussed how being able to access and separate different subsets of metadata from a larger dataset can assist research.
  • The benefits of such datasets were discussed, including the potential for lateral analysis for determining, e.g., intertextual relationships, etc.
  • The definition of a letter as an item was discussed, considering issues relating to letters sent in unusual containers, or including other items such as newspaper cuttings. Does this require validation checks/selection criteria for what constitutes a letter?
  • How can new questions be asked of large datasets? Can questions across disciplinary lines/time periods be successfully posed, and how does one ensure accurate interpretation of data when working on ever larger, interdisciplinary queries?
  • How does one manage coded language in correspondence? The group discussed the necessity of disambiguation, and how to encode meaning accurately.
  • How accurate is the metadata accrued so far by large databases such as EMLO? These are based on early catalogues/card catalogues from the early 20th century, and in the time since new cataloguing standards have been developed and applied to newer metadata added to the dataset. How can projects like EMLO mitigate the effect of data produced under different circumstances with different cataloguing standards, or data produced for specific purposes in smaller datasets which are later incorporated into the larger dataset.
  • The role of the scholar, curator, librarian, and student as interpreter of metadata in large correspondence corpora was also discussed, mitigating against the potential for drawing misleading conclusions.
  • The group discussed the problem of the way visualization presents all data points as equally stable and valid, which can concretise uncertain data without any way to caveat its presentation. Participants concluded that there remains an important place for scholars to describe in detail the way in which the visualization was constructed and the dataset underlying it, in order to clearly communicate the parameters of accuracy in the displayed data.

Next Meeting

The Network’s next meeting, on “Curating Correspondence”, will take place at 5-6:30pm on Thursday 9 November in the Christie Room at the John Rylands Library. It will explore issues relating to best practices for curating, cataloguing, digitizing, and displaying correspondence and related metadata, as well as the challenges of working with correspondence in non-Latin scripts.

5 thoughts on “Networks and Individuals: Opportunities and challenges in mapping relationships through the study of correspondence

  1. Reblogged this on What is a letter? and commented:
    Insightful and informative summary of papers, discussions, and very useful list of relevant questions that necessitate further research and debate.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close